『詩の国秋田』にちなんで(4) - Contribution of Professor Alexander Dolin ー 

2012/08/28

 

Professor Alexander Dolin teaches Japanese Literature and Civilization Studies at Akita International University(AIU).  Prof. Dolin also writes haiku.

Professor Dolin helped us in many ways as one of the founders of the Akita International Haiku Network.

Prof. Dolin kindly contributed to us the following article “The Rediscovery of Japanese Poetry” for the yearly pamphlet 詩の国秋田 : Akita – the Land of Poetry published in August , 2009.

 

 

Here are a photo of Professor Dolin and his brief profile.

 

 

 

PROFILE

 

  Alexander Dolin (b. 1949) is teaching Comparative Culture, World Civilization and Japanese Literature at Akita International University.  Graduate of Moscow State University. Ph.D degree in Japanese Literature at Russian Academy of Sciences. In Japan since 1991. Before moving to Akita worked as a Professor of Comparative Literature and Culture at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies .

   A, Dolin is an author of several comprehensive monographs on Japanese literature and culture, Russian literature, culture and society  as well as on the world civilizations issued in Russian, German and Japanese. Many volumes of classic and modern Japanese literature (especially poetry) were published  in his translation. He is a member of several Japanese and international  academic societies,  of Russian Writers’ Union and  International PEN Club. Award of the  Special Contribution to Culture Prize by the All-Japan Translators Association (1995)

    Prof. Dolin has a long time experience of writing for media in Russian, English and Japanese including such Japanese newspapers and magazines as “Sankei shimbun“,  “Chuocoron” “Shincho 45”.

 

Here is Professor Dolin’s article contributed to us.

The Rediscovery of Japanese Poetry

2009/05/09

By ALEXANDER DOLIN

Japanese tanka and haiku are already well known all over the world and don’t need any special recommendations. Thousands of Europeans and Americans have joined the club of haiku lovers, hundreds tried to compose tanka in their native language. Numerous collections of poetic translations from the old and new Japanese classics in English, French, German and Russian flooded the book market.  The staggering success of traditional Japanese poetry in the West might seem a miracle if we look back at the beginning of the XX c. when tanka and haiku were barely known in Europe and many Japanese were ashamed of their “imperfect” poetic tools.

Since the late 19th c. in the West poets, critics and readers at large split into two opposite factions regarding the appraisal of classical Japanese poetry.

One group would always treat tanka and haiku as exotic decorative genres quite alien to the glorious traditions of European poetry. The members of this faction, even those who liked Japanese civilization, remained very skeptical as far as the possibilities of traditional Japanese verse were concerned. G.Sansom, the most renowned expert in Japanese history and culture, even called Japanese poetic language “an elegant but ungrateful tool”. This attitude, which had influenced European “Japonisme” in the Arts, has been always rather typical of some Western literati who tended to regard Japanese artifacts and poems at large just as beautiful and trendy toys.

However the larger part of critics and readers would accept the Japanese poetic tradition as a mystical revelation full of sublime beauty, supernatural wisdom and unbelievable eloquence – something like a supreme poetic truth and absolute perfection that is a gem in itself, even if its translation looked like an ugly rugged rock.

Of course this blind worshipping denied any need for in-depth formal analysis, practical comparisons or constructive criticism. It dominated in the early 20th c. and is still amazingly explicit in some parts of the world – for example, in Russia. Some self-proclaimed “poets” took advantage of this situation bringing to the market collections of clumsy verse or word for word prosaic interpretations under the name of tanka, or haiku. In fact it was either a mere stylization or a word for word academic translation. Later a number of talented European and American poets contributed to the development of haiku and tanka poetry in the West.

On the first sight, traditional Japanese syllabic verse seems to be rather primitive to the Western readers. For about 15 centuries it remained within the boundaries of a single poetic meter based on the combination of only two syllabic units – 5 or 7 syllables in each. It is a unique example of loyalty to one formal design among the world poetic traditions. But let’s refer to the observations of Professor N. Konrad, the founder of Russian school of classical Japanese studies:

Japanese syllabic verse based on the variation of 5 and 7-syllables units would always sound monotonous. This monotony inflicted by the meter is partly neutralized by the current of musical accents in the verse, which can vary even in two poems with a similar metric pattern. One might add here the melodic patterns that can be different in every particular tanka. Thus alleged visible metric monotony is compensated by acoustic means.”

The first encounter of the Europeans with the legacy of Japanese classics resulted in a few collections of tanka and haiku translated by the leading Japanologists of the time. They tried to perceive the overtones of the miniature poems but failed as there was no ground for it ready yet. Medieval poetics and aesthetics were still shrouded in mystery as the major treatises of the poetic canon remained unavailable.

B.H.Chamberlain in his anthology “The Classical Japanese Poetry” (1891) made a nice selection from the classical monuments. His only concern was to preserve the “idea” rendering  the poems in a westernized form with conventional rhythm and even rhyme:

Oh love! Who gave you

koishi to wa

thy superfluous name?

ta ga nazukeken

Loving and dying –

koto naran

isn’t it the same?

shinu to zo tada ni

 

iubekarikeru

(“Kokinshu”, #698)

W.J. Aston, a famous researcher of the late 19th c. and a renowned translator of Japanese classics, was less infatuated with exotic images and therefore was more successful in his experiments. Unfortunately he was not a poet and lamented in his works on the absence of a poetic genius who could offer an authentic metric version of the best tanka from the MANYOSHU  and the KOKINSHU anthologies. Unlike many scholars of the late 20th century who would call their unsophisticated interpretations of  tanka “poetic translations”, Aston defined his translations as word for word (or line by line) prosaic rendering.

Here is the same tanka by an unknown author from the KOKINSHU presented by Aston

Who would it have been

That first gave love

This name?

“Dying” is the plain word

He might have used.

The translation is correct but rather neutral, almost immaculate. Of course it is a poor match to the magic poetic splash of emotion in original.

Lafcadio Hearn (1850-1904), a renowned American intellectual who lived many years in Japan and published fine translations of Japanese folk tales and ghost stories, also worked on the translations of tanka and haiku. As his proficiency in Japanese was not sufficient, Hearn would hire native speakers as assistants.

This point definitely contributed to the authenticity of his translations although his poetic talent seems very dubious. Hearn tried to keep the original one-line structure of both tanka and haiku making them sound either like pathetic exclamations or like prosaic contemplations.

In the posthumous edition of Hearn’s poetic translations long lines were cut by the editors into two uneven parts, which distorted even the best of the poems:

Wake up! Wake up! – I will

make thee my

Comrade, thou sleeping

butterfly.

(Basho)

In 1896 a collection of poetic translations by Karl Florenz was printed in Germany under the romantic title “A Poetic Greeting from the Orient”. It contained pretty adaptations of the tanka taken at random from different sources, which were inspired by the Japonisme trend in European culture. Needless to say how far were these bijouts from the original songs.

However a number of poems presented in the “Geschichte Japanisches Literatur” (1906) by Florenz were much more correct being in fact normal word for word translations. German versions of tanka by Florenz, Ratgen and Hauser became an incentive for some Russian poets of the time.

(TO BE CONTINUED)

 

Please check the following sites of our network, and you will enjoy haiku by Professor Dolin’s students as well as by himself.

Prof. Dolin teaches haiku to the students in his class of Japanese Literature every November, inviting me to his classes as a guest judge.

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2009/06/28

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2009/07/25

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2009/08/08

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2009/11/28

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2010/01/30

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2010/02/06

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2010/02/13

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2010/11/27

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2010/12/04

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2010/12/11

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2011/06/18

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2012/01/14

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2012/01/21

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2012/01/28

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2012/02/11

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2012/02/18

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2012/02/25

https://akitahaiku.wordpress.com/2012/03/10

 

The next posting ‘『詩の国秋田』にちなんで(5)-石川三佐男先生の卓見-’ appears on August 30.

 

蛭田 秀法Hidenori Hiruta

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s